The Happy Arab News Service

Monday, December 25, 2006

We Got New Friends

We got new friends or the Mother of all conspiracy theories

First a new conspiracy theory. . .

The New York Times

Published: December 22, 2006

. . .

. . .

Last week, a group of prominent Saudi clerics and university professors called on the government to begin actively backing Iraq’s Sunnis. The clerics described what they called a Persian-Jewish partnership besieging the Sunnis (!!! NB).

“There is a segment in this country that will do everything the U.S. wants,” said Turki al-Rasheed, who runs a group that seeks to encourage democracy in the Persian Gulf. “But fortunately the big leaders know this whole agenda will take us to hell.”

The New York Times is reporting the Saudi deliberations over how to face Iran and its ambitious president and some of the stuff is just hard to believe. . .

Saudi newspapers now denounce Iran’s growing power. Religious leaders here, who view Shiism as heresy, have begun talking about a “Persian onslaught” that threatens Islam. In the salons and diwans of Riyadh, the “Iranian threat” is raised almost as frequently as the stock market.

“Iran has become more dangerous than Israel itself,” said Sheik Musa bin Abdulaziz, editor of the magazine Al Salafi (!!!), who describes himself as a moderate Salafi, a fundamentalist Muslim movement. “The Iranian revolution has come to renew the Persian presence in the region. This is the real clash of civilizations.”

Many here say a showdown with Iran is inevitable. . .

. . .

“The possibility of having conflict is very high,” said Abdelrahman Rashid, managing director of the satellite news channel Al Arabiya and a respected Saudi columnist. “Who will face the Iranians tomorrow? Just the Israelis alone? I don’t think that is possible.”

Now we should only figure out who are our real friends - the Persians or the Khalidgees. You can adopt whatever theory that's more to your liking.

The whole thing makes me think once again about what Olmert is actually trying to achieve and why the Saudis are suddenly pushing so hard for a comprehensive Israeli Arab peace settlement (apart of course from their worries about being blown away by their insane Arab street). The Saudis also appear to have got some highly original ideas on how to undermine the continuing Shia advance in the region.

A member of the Saudi royal family with knowledge of the discussions between Mr. Cheney and King Abdullah said the king had presented Mr. Cheney with a plan to raise oil production to force down the price, in hopes of causing economic turmoil for Iran without becoming directly involved in a confrontation.

The Saudis can hardly orchestrate anything like this since their production capacity (proven reserves notwithstanding) is reportedly falling far behind the market.

And the Saudis threaten the US against prematurely pulling out of Iraq and they do it in no mean terms:

Shortly afterward, Mr. Obaid’s op-ed article was published, building on earlier public comments that Saudi Arabia intends to get serious about Iran and may back Sunnis in Iraq in the event of an abrupt United States pullout. Neither Prince Bandar nor Prince Turki was available for comment for this article. . .

With all the respect I have for the Saudis (and I have none) my advise to Ehud Olmert - stay away from this Sunni Shia shit. It's none of our business.

Actually I think it's the first lines of the article that contain the real message and the real lesson for all involved. . .

At a late-night reading this week, a self-styled poet raised his hand for silence and began a riff on neighboring Iraq, in the old style of Bedouin storytellers.

“Saddam Hussein was a real leader who deserved our support,” he began, making up the lines as he went. “He kept Iraq stable and peaceful,” he added, “and most of all he fought back the Iranians.” He continued, “His only mistake was invading Kuwait.” (!!! NB)


How fucking true !!!

Labels: , , , ,

Back to HappyArabNews

Proclaimed un monstruooo muy monstruoso at 11:51 PM